Lxqt vs xfce reddit. If your PC is powerful enough, try KDE.

KDE is very customizable and has more modern features that XFCE lacks. Gnome and KDE. Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. 2. Plasma 5. KDE Plasma has all the customization options that you’ll need to make it unique and your own, while GNOME is modern, fast, and feels more commercial than the other two desktop environments. 2) Installing them on a distro container of your choice You can use Toolbox or Distrobox for that matter Oct 4, 2016 · In fact, LXQt 0. LXDE is lightest out of the box, and remains lightest if you use GTK2 apps. XFCE is lighter and much more modular. Community releases include Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQT, Mate Debian w/ LXDE is most assuredly lighter than Lubuntu, both memory- and HDD space-wise. Yes, it is a xorg, not wayland. Looks pretty clean, and its pretty basic. Depending on what you mean by "desktop environment" you might include simple window managers that use less. As for file managers, I prefer Caja (MATE) to Thunar (Xfce) for one reason - it supports the extra panel, which makes it much easier to Copy/Move files between directories. 7 star rating. Award. ago. I'm now using xfce over lxde. Gnome 3 makes my computer run really hot. Dolphin takes a while to open because unlike in the other dm, (including lxqt), the file manager framework does not take part on rendering the desktop (usually, it does in some setups) . They aren't really that low on memory and are not as complete and well working as xfce. It’s incredibly lightweight when pared down and strikes the balance between extremely lightweight DEs like LXDE or LXQt and “fat” DEs like KDE and GNOME. T42- IBM 2004 Bodhi Legacy. lxde / lxqt. LXDE is dormant. Then, open an “xterm” window and get the result of `free -mh` command. 3. 2. KDE is more customizable, but heavier. 20 Jan 2023 5 min read. Haven't tried lxle but have run lxqt and lxde in search of a low resource de. Now, your XFCE4 panel and Whisker menu should have a customized appearance based on your modifications CSS. It suits well the rolling release nature of Tumbleweed because it is more frequently updated than the other two. Never used LXQT, seems like an okay idea. css file or - Open a terminal window and type: nano ~/. One issue however is very few apps are still GTK2 (though some are; eg. 489 MiB Mageia KDE. You might want to look at wikipedia's list of light-weight Linux distribution, specifically the window/desktop manager column. I'm using KDE right now and it has great GTK One article says LXQT and LXDE is faster than XFCE while another one says this isn't true as it depends on what programs you use. e. Bodhi is light and different at the same time. KDE on Manjaro is buggy. Beginners and former Windows users simply adopt the way of working in LXQt. For example if you have bluetooth headphones or speakers and such, GNOME makes it easier to manage in the gui rather than having to manage via the cli on lxde if I recall correctly. 429 Mib Arch KDE. No problems ever. LXQt uses the Qt framework for its UI, like KDE does. It is a good start for learning linux, storage of configuration, tunning of Light environment. long story short which uses less resources ram and CPU Xfce or KDE and which lighter qt apps or gtk apps thx Although there is a small difference in RAM usage between LXQt and XFCE, LXQt is still a lighter environment. Jun 1, 2022 · Ankush Das. XFCE is lighter, a little less customizable. Both KDE and XFCE should be fine for the usage. If you want lightweight DE go with LxQt, if you want DE with large community (regular releases, quick bugfixes and stuff) go with KDE. In my opinion, this is not ready for primetime. ii gir1. Oct 7, 2021 · the same thing in LXQT , i have 345 mb , and on lxde 270 mb That its, why 'LXQT never do winthe race against xfce , the better handling does the rest. XFCE is faster than all three but I don't like the look and feel. Archived post. KDE Plasma and Xfce are two popular desktop environment options for lightweight Linux distributions. 4. Re: performance of KDE vs. The efforts have switched to LXQt, which is the lightest current DE you can get. KDE Plasma is definitely better than XFCE in terms of customization but XFCE is lightweight and stable. Jan 15, 2024 · Find the best product instantly. Apr 21, 2022 · Cinnamon desktop is another fork of the GNOME desktop. Moksha (Enlightenment) is very light. I am satisfied compared to other DE. 1K subscribers in the LXQt community. MATE: 465 MB Memory used. Share. 11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). LXQt apparently plans to launch v2. , more than LXDE). If you have 4 or more gigs of ram I would definitely go with mate. Ich nutze auf Arbeit XFCE, war bisher das "beste". This is what dpkg -l "*libxfce*" is showing right now on my system. I like running XFCE, and then running kwin as my window manager. gtkを採用している。unix哲学（モジュール性、再利用性）を体現している. All the backends/libraries are 4. Lubuntu is migrating to LXQt (or already has, I am unsure) which uses about the same amount of RAM as Xfce (i. The video posting and discussion group for SwitchedToLinux We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Xfce desktop: A popular lightweight desktop environment. This lets me run XFCE, but use KDE effects like wobbly windows. Apr 30, 2016 · 7. LXQt is very similar to XFCE, as well as the way the Windows desktop works. The way that I would prefer to do it is set up a VM of Fedora or Rocky on my proxmox server and then just rdp into the VM when wanted/needed. Xfce LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only one part of the story. I think LXQT is a little more responsive, but the difference is almost negligible. Mediocre_Field_1661. hexchat ). al1pa. •. config/gtk-3. The reason it's not recommended is because it can interfere with certain major upgrades from one version to another, because Fedora Silverblue's purpose is to have the root filesystem to not be modified. The new version of Thunar does support this, and it should be available on LM 21. XFCE (discussion with Zaraned) - it's true, the KDE team has put a lot of work into efficiency and some testers have found KDE uses less system resources than Apr 27, 2021 · LXQt/LXDE vs. But because of the rise of the new desktop environments, the current situation of XFCE is actually a bit awkward. More options to choose like menu more panel plugins etc. the good old LxDE, so much so that it's almost the same as xfce, or worse. you just forgot that KDE also comes with more CPU load which is probably way more crucial than 200 MB more RAM. And Ubuntu generally has more pre-installed packages than Debian, but realistically the two are probably very comparable In my experience, XFCE still uses fewer ressources than KDE. Antix and MX Linux FLuxbox are examples. I've never gone wronf with it. Using an Arch install recently I went with, you guessed it xfce. lxdeはgtkを採用。後継としてqtに移行したlxqtが作られた。 lxqtの誕生によりlxdeは終了していくという話もあったものの、現在もlxdeの開発は継続している模様. LXQt is a bundle of software packages under development, with the aim of providing a complete desktop environment. LXDE/LXQT is lightweight and easy to use, AFAIK AwesomeWM is even lighter but requires some configuration for intuitiveness (I know Lua so i could preconfigure it for him). It is not themeable to the extent of the other plugins in the collection; specifically Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. Went from unusable with Win 10 to daily driver with LMDE 6+xfce. LXQt does use slightly more RAM in general, which will result in things having to be put out of RAM earlier, which does cost CPU cycles and I/O wait time. If your PC is powerful enough, try KDE. paulgrey506. anyway, which Distro is depending on your goals. The main reason why is the new, and supposedly default, menu plugin, Fancy Menu. If you run a pig like firefox you will have a baaaaad time. Silejonu. But there are several reasons for it to use xfce in first place. Also (at least on the Arch repo with everything included) the Xfce package is 41mibs vs Lxqt's 23 mibs. I think both are stable. LXQT ist auch in Ordnung, fühlt sich aber nicht so polished an. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. When I do use Xfce, I usually combine it with picom to get some nicer effects for instance. MATE desktop: A traditional looking desktop resembling the GNOME 2 era. So I thought it was a wasted project, but SWAY integration sounds like a game changer. Just type following bash commands in your terminal = It survived. The older your hardware, generally the lighter ones will work better, but many ten year old machines (or older) can work well with all desktops. XFCE is light, but not as much as LXQt. It's like the nginx of DEs when compared to Apache (GNOME/KDE) and Lighttpd (LXDE/LXQT). You are likely to have GTK programs in LXQt and Qt programs in LXDE. Try both out and see which you like. Reply. The resource usage & loading times suck vs. r LXQt vs Xfce : Which is Better? LXQt. When I click on an icon, the program just opens. Jul 6, 2023 · The Linux distros that use XFCE as the default desktop include Xubuntu, Manjaro, etc. Apr 5, 2024 · 4. It has a rather conservative design and is similar to Xfce. well started to work slowly after I manually deleted XFCE, LXDE, LXQT. Apr 11, 2022 · Xfce is most polished and has more features than other two. It's more a matter of what you prefer. EDIT: Thanks to everyone who had answered. 18 in sid. I run xfce on arch. The Qt framework gives LXQt a modern and cohesive appearance, regardless of the components chosen. It is not as customizable as KDE Plasma but it is not that bad. Our ambition is providing the best perfomance on older machines. Bad advice. I like gnome for productivity. Xfce vs KDE on old/low-end laptop Hey, so I have this old laptop it has a bad CPU and everything what should I use Xfce or KDE since people say KDE uses as ram as Xfce. Kde is jam packed with features. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. XFCE is definitely the more stable of the two. I've been using it for a while for college stuff and local media consumption, i'm pretty happy with it's performance. It runs very well too these days, you can check some of the benchmarks of KDE on OpenSUSE on YouTube, plus I love most of their Qt apps. I have used both Linux Mint 18 XFCE and Lubuntu 18. It seems easier, it also seemed less resource intensive as RDP did. Cinnamon Desktop on Ubuntu 22. I keep switching between the two; a week or two with Xfce, then a week or two with KDE. Bodhi is a winner in many aspects. 389 MiB Void “minimal” + KDE. It could make a big difference, or it could not. This provides granular control over every aspect of the desktop environment, from window behaviors to panel appearances. "Low resource usage combined with flexible configuration" is the primary reason people pick Xfce over the competition. Mate is better in that regard, but I find KDE uses less ram on boot than either and feels faster to me. I don't know which one is more consistent. 0/gtk. It really depends if you really want customization or just want a desktop that is clean. and that's is why LXDE is always living , because LXQT'S Ram is too high, The absolute Lightwight-Distros do not change to LXQT We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. But that's just my humble opinion. Sep 5, 2023 · XFCE offers a vast array of settings that users can adjust. If you're looking for tech support, /r/Linux4Noobs is a friendly communi Xfce can be customized a lot further than MATE, but it takes a bit of effort. It's more user-friendly, though. If I may, give a spin to Ubuntu Mate to test a very well refined Mate. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. This plugin exists as a QWidget with the Popup application hint set. My personal favorite is Budgie. If you have an older or less powerful machine, particularly an old netbook, XFCE would be a great choice. Mate is always my choice due to light memory reqs and hi speed. Make your modifications - save and finally restart the panel: xfce4-panel -r. If your machine handles XFCE smoothly, stay on it, if not, go "down" to LXQt. I use Xfce pretty exclusively though. I you want to taste an already configured openbox to see if you like it, you can try crunchbang++ (a debian based openbox distro) in a VM. It’s incredibly light on resources, using just 340 MB RAM and less than 1% CPU usage. xfce. To help you pick a suitable desktop environment, we will be comparing Yes I could do the same with LXDE, but I find the sound support within the gui for GNOME is easier to work with. I'd go for QT-based. Nope, they're pretty the same, no big diff. • 5 yr. Personally, my favorite is to install both. It’s so responsive. qtとgtkについて May 16, 2024 · XFCE is fast and lightweight, and you can customize it a lot. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. Openbox is lighter than xfce and can be configured to suit your needs. 436 MiB Arch KDE (by Revenge) 446 MiB Sabayon KDE. Also once you get into KDE, you can make it look BEAUTIFUL, just Actually I used Lxqt because I found it to be faster than Xfce, I based this of online data comparing the two and Xfce vs Lxqt's predicessor: Lxde ( which is probably lighter than Lxqt). KDE can be alright if you configure it right (disable file indexer, don't use krunner, make sure it uses your GPU when doing compositing tasks etc. LXQT vs LXDE (Linux Mint) Discussion. They're both pretty light. Haven't used Fedora for about a year or so, but Xubuntu always felt more integrated with Xfce than Fedora, if that makes sense. Pick the one you like the most. XFCE and LXDE are both popular desktop choices. Of course you can install both in arch and switch between them. XFCE. LXQt is lightest when using Qt5 apps. LXDE is good, fast but really minimal meaning it has basic features. while the distros that use LXDE as the default desktop include Lubuntu and so on. Xfce is smooth. 200-300MB of RAM in 64Bits. Mate and Xfce are both highly customizable desktop environments. Bienvenue sur r/redditenfrancais, la communauté qui vous propose le meilleur des publis anglophones traduites en français ! La publication d'origine est indiquée à la fin de chaque publication. 175 subscribers in the SwitchedToLinux community. LXDE looks more basic compared to Xfce. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 0:amd64 4. Low enough memory, about 500. They're implementing a new power manager and already use that to display the battery level, but it's not yet feature-complete, so the Xfce power manager is used in parallel. With 8 gb of ram I would not worry about the extra 50 mb used with xfce or 100+ mb used with mate or kde over lxde or lxqt, it will seriously be inconsequential. XFCE: 448 MB Memory used. I like kde for customization. 0-1 amd64 Typelib file for libxfce4ui. If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. Xfce panel also has a similar level of customizability to Plasma's panel, the main problem is that there are generally less applets to choose from. 18. All are about the same. Xfce is one of the most lightweight desktop environments out there. • 3 mo. However, I'd spend $50-60 and replace 2GB RAM with 8GB. You all make very valid points. 1. Add to Safari. Its resource usage may be low, but there are still many options for We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. XFCE isn't that bad in comparison, it's at least not Gnome. Xfce. LXQt: 391 MB Memory used. Desktop computer: KDE Plasma ️ Without Akonadi, Baloo and other things I don't use, KDE may use less RAM: 385 MiB Void LXQt + KDE. no one mentioned anything about CPU usage though. IRC web client: https://kiwiirc. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. That's never happened to me with XFCE. 80-150MB RAM usage in 32bits. Your choice. I've already abandoned most of Ubuntu by running i3 and various other non-distro specific app replacements for most tasks, and the only xfce apps I'm depending on are xfce4-power-manager, xfce4-clipman, and xfce4-terminal. Honestly a lot of DEs are approaching about the same place weight wise. Manjaro (or Arch for that matter) comes with the latest packages with access to the AUR (Arch User Repository See full list on theinfobits. Fedora came unthemed and had different settings in strange places that made it feel a little clunkier, but either are good options. r/guitarpedals. 6 feels more complete, but it's subjective. (I had written that comment after upgrading and confirming on my system). Review Linux, BSD and Free Software operating systems on this subreddit Out off all the standard start menu type DE's XFCE is by far the most solid and bug-free out of the bunch (use the Whisker menu for an updated look) where in all my testing adventures Cinnamon would be the biggest offender for bugs/ram usage (Mint lovers will be quick to deny, but my findings are firm). Enlightenment E17. XFCE is simply the best. Or install xfce and kde apps, you can fully use kde apps in xfce. I've evaluated all the ups and downs and decided to settle with LXQT for now. My choice is Mate desktop environment but LXDE or i3wm also go fine. However, it's harder to set up than xfce. They are close enough that you can just pick the one whose look & feel you like more and go enjoy it! 1. . Or check it out in the app stores LXQt vs Xfce, whats the differnece comments. KDE and Gnome are a little more heavy and Gnome likes to cache if there is memory available. 5. This is all historical & blogged about (the older stuff on LXDE sites) To your question. Design Aesthetics. Linux is quite happy running both frameworks at the same time and generally does. XFCE and KDE are both very lightweight, but with KDE it is a lot more Customizable and aims to be lightweight and fast while XFCE doesn't have as much customizable options but still is fast. ), but even then it usually still uses more RAM than XFCE does out of the box. A rolling release distro featuring a user-friendly installer, tested updates and a community of friendly users for support. Meet Panos Sakalakis, a web wizard, blogging buff, podcasting pro, and SEO sorcerer with XFCE, Mate and LXQT are light or middle weight. css. The others I don't have an opinion on. It does its job well. Try to pick a desktop that works for you then pick a distro and see how it goes. Probably KDE though. Official releases include Xfce, KDE, Gnome, and the minimal CLI-Installer Architect. Then you get into the lighter distros that often use window managers. Gnome, kde, lxqt, cinnamon, xfce, Mate, and more Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I also am unsure how much risk I would be exposed I currently am in a limbo between operating on a QT-based desktop environment (LXQT) versus a GTK-based desktop environment (XFCE). Personally I think KDE is the best. I have been using xfce with the numix theme and icons. Both LXQT and LXDE sound nice, and (despite not being official Mint flavors) should be accessible from the Mint Software Manager. Cinnamon, because of its monolithic structure, is by far less customizable. Community releases include Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQT, Mate, OpenBox and builds for ARM devices like the Raspberry Pi and the Pinebook. upvotes · comments Xfce is very customizable. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Xfce, TDE (Trinity), and LXDE are probably your best bets out of the 10 options considered. It is uncomplicated to learn and from this reason might be a good choice for someone who is new to Linux. If it is an old laptop, maybe XFCE is better. Sort by: TheGrubLord. But I don't really see the point. Welcome to /r/Linux! This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting developments and press. XFCE is lighterweight so I'd say it's more responsive. 10 (lxqt) on an old Dell netbook. Search the web for Xfce customization: it's plenty of tutorials. etc :-) But I dunno why and probably there is some background, but my fears are that there might be problems with browsers, videos and other modern stuff if it is being run in these not mainstream environments. I never tried Mate on Manjaro, but used it on Ubuntu Mate, then switched to Manjaro Xfce. May 9, 2022 · A quick look at the popular DEs (Desktop Environments) 2022. compare majaro's xfce with the plasma of kubuntu, and to the gnome of fedora and it would be more fair. Menu items disappearing and twitching that kinda thing. Let’s have a look at the Mint variants one by one. When I would be done in an instance, the xrdp service would still run in the background and being seriously hoggy, so I would always have to sudo service xrdp stop wsl --shutown, then I would also have to remember to start it. 04 Jammy Jellyfish Frankly I've been extremely disappointed with LxQT up until now. Community releases include Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQT, Mate 1. 2-libxfce4ui-2. Looks better than GNOME/KDE if configured properly and runs faster than LXDE/LXQT in most cases. Open the ~/. I would go lxde until the next stable Debian release. 304K subscribers in the linuxmasterrace community. LXQT is really cool, but development is slow, and it is a little bit buggy (for me, at least) XFCE is functional, and easy to make look good, but it does not really work with my flow. If yes, it perfectly runs Debian stable with firmware-amd-graphics, firmware-realtek and firmware-atheros from non-free repo and an udev rule to disable autosuspend of ar3011 / 3012 BT USB built-in dongle. Hi everyone! I'm thinking about finally switching from xubuntu, to Debian + xfce. LXDE is the lightest without going completely plain with just a window manager (which I chose to do) KDE, though I'd recommend lxde/lxqt for the best battery life. And they're not lightweight since both switched to GTK3 completely. 5K subscribers in the distroreviews community. 0 sometime this month. My favorite of the three Mint Flavors is XFCE, but I'm interested in trying something a little lighter, out of both curiosity and interest in finding as many backups as I can. Cold boot 2: same as 1, but it’s tested after Aug 31, 2020 · Performance on LXQt, just as on LXDE, is excellent. Depends on your usage, and when it decides to go nuts on a large amount of files. Okay not all, only libxfce4panel is older one. I want to use either or, but would rather use one that I can most certainly benefit from, such as cosmetics, resource-managment, and utility. While Xfce is still favored more for some of the best lightweight Linux distributions, KDE Plasma is not a resource-heavy desktop either. The real problem will be the applications you run. Cold boot 1: After cold boot, I opened the application menu to make the icons loaded. I See Gnome 42, Gnome 3, Gnome 2, Becoming Gnome and 2 DE's with an X in there name. However, more so than just being light, it feels light. It's really buggy. However, in times past, xrdp (and xorg in general) has proven to be something of a nightmare for me, and I admit that may be down to wanting to use LXQT as my DE, since GNOME has had zero problems with We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. • 5 mo. 412 MiB KDE Neon. So I installed lubuntu recently on my potato machine (core 2 duo, 3 GB of ram, some old graphics card I won't bother mentioning (ati sapphire x1650 btw) and a HDD) Although lxqt is ok I want something I can customise more, even if it's just the basic layout of things, one of the main things I don't like that much is the menu in Lxqt with it's win 95 style, although xfce has a more win 7 look We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Mar 10, 2021 · Briefly, the available choices are the following: Cinnamon desktop: A modern touch on traditional desktop. Lxqt is also good but it has less features although it is little bit lighter and snappier i would say. Mate was nice looking, but, at least on Ubuntu Mate, it was pretty buggy. I will make sure to follow how things develop now. 467 MiB PCLinuxOS KDE. The Lightweight Desktop Environment is the product of the merge between the LXDE-Qt and the Razor-qt… Advertisement I'd like to know how Bodhi and its Moksha DE fit into the hierarchy of lightweight DEs. XFCE is stable as bedrock. com XFCE is often considered a middle weight champion and LXQT is lighter still. You can replace any component you don't like. LXDE uses GTK, like GNOME and XFCE. com . I've experienced KDE crashes just from changing desktop themes, and had to work my way back to a desktop environment entirely from the commandline. eo ek mj iy xv as om ij gz dd